Rethinking Clemency: Dershowitz’s Take on Biden’s Pardoning Strategy

President Biden’s pardon of Hunter may ignite a firestorm of legal and political consequences for the entire Biden family.

At a Glance

  • President Biden’s pardon of Hunter Biden could lead to further legal troubles for the Biden family
  • Hunter Biden can no longer claim Fifth Amendment rights against self-incrimination
  • Alan Dershowitz argues Biden should pardon non-violent Jan. 6 protesters for fairness
  • The pardon exposes Hunter to potential questioning about foreign business deals
  • Allegations of the Biden family’s foreign influence peddling remain unresolved

The Double-Edged Sword of Presidential Clemency

President Joe Biden’s decision to pardon his son Hunter has sent shockwaves through the political landscape, potentially opening a Pandora’s box of legal challenges for the Biden family. While the pardon may have spared Hunter from a prison sentence, it has inadvertently stripped him of his Fifth Amendment protections against self-incrimination, potentially making him a key witness in future investigations.

Legal expert Alan Dershowitz warns that this move could backfire spectacularly. “President Joe Biden’s extraordinarily broad pardon of his son may have saved Hunter from a prison sentence, but it might actually mark the beginning of worse legal troubles for the Biden clan,” Dershowitz stated, highlighting the unintended consequences of the President’s action.

The Pardon’s Far-Reaching Implications

The pardon’s repercussions extend beyond Hunter Biden. A Republican-led House committee has estimated that the Bidens and their associates earned over $27 million from overseas business deals without registering as foreign agents. This revelation, coupled with Hunter’s newfound vulnerability to questioning, could lead to a deeper probe into the family’s alleged foreign influence peddling.

Hunter Biden is in a precarious situation. He may be compelled to answer questions about his foreign business dealings and his father’s potential involvement during Joe Biden’s vice presidency. Allegations of impropriety, including an email suggesting Joe Biden, referred to as “pop,” takes “half his salary,” and the identity of the “Big Guy” in business documents, remain unresolved and ripe for investigation.

A Call for Equal Justice

In a surprising twist, Dershowitz has introduced a contentious argument concerning President Biden’s responsibilities following the pardon of his son. He maintains that to uphold the principles of fairness, Biden should extend clemency to non-violent January 6 protesters. This perspective challenges the administration to reflect on the ethical dimensions of presidential pardons and their capacity to promote unity and justice in a deeply divided nation.

Dershowitz criticizes the disparate treatment between those involved in Black Lives Matter protests and the Capitol riot, suggesting that non-violent protesters from January 6 should also be pardoned. He argues that prosecutions were based on political affiliations rather than actions, comparing the treatment of Trump supporters to Black Lives Matter protesters. This stance emphasizes the need for equal justice under the law, asserting that equally situated individuals should be treated equally, regardless of their political leanings.

The Road Ahead

As the dust settles on President Biden’s controversial decision, the nation watches closely to see how this will affect the political landscape and the upcoming investigations. The pardon, intended as an act of protection for Hunter Biden, may have inadvertently exposed the entire Biden family to increased scrutiny and potential legal challenges. With the 2024 election on the horizon, these developments could significantly impact public perception and the Democratic Party’s standing.

RELATED ARTICLESMORE FROM AUTHOR