CIA Cover-Up? – New JFK Files Released

Newly released JFK assassination files reveal significant CIA surveillance of Lee Harvey Oswald prior to Kennedy’s death, but stop short of identifying a definitive shooter despite evidence of an intelligence agency cover-up.

At a Glance 

  • The Trump administration released over 77,000 pages of previously classified JFK assassination documents
  • Files show extensive CIA surveillance of Lee Harvey Oswald before the assassination
  • Documents reveal CIA’s deep infiltration of foreign governments, including 14 Cuban diplomats who were CIA agents
  • Historian Jefferson Morley called the release “the most exciting news around JFK records since the 1990s”
  • The documents have reignited debate about potential CIA involvement despite not contradicting the Warren Commission’s official conclusion

New Documents Reignite Decades-Old Questions

The National Archives and Records Administration has released thousands of documents related to President John F. Kennedy’s assassination, providing unprecedented access to information that has been closely guarded for decades. While the files don’t definitively answer who shot JFK, they reveal extensive CIA surveillance of Lee Harvey Oswald before the assassination, raising questions about what intelligence officials knew and when they knew it. The newly declassified documents provide enhanced clarity on CIA actions during the Cold War era but still leave significant gaps in understanding the full context surrounding Kennedy’s death. 

Many of the documents were previously available but are now more complete, with fewer redactions. The release includes details about Oswald’s trip to Mexico City before the assassination and his interactions with the Soviet embassy, both subjects of intense speculation over the decades. 

Despite President Trump’s earlier claims that the files would be completely unredacted, some information remains concealed, with certain documents still held by the National Archives, CIA, and FBI that have not been made public. 

Deep State Implications and CIA Operations

The documents provide a revealing look at the extensive reach of U.S. intelligence agencies during the Cold War. They show that the CIA had significant presence in American embassies around the world, sometimes comprising up to 40-50% of personnel. Among the most startling revelations is that 14 Cuban diplomats were actually CIA agents, and two Cuban ambassadors provided valuable intelligence to the United States. These findings point to a pervasive intelligence apparatus operating across borders during this tumultuous period in American history. 

“He’s a subject of deep interest to the CIA long before the assassination, and the extent of this has only become clear in the last few years,” Mr Morley said. 

According to Frank De Varona, possible figures involved in Kennedy’s assassination include Lyndon Baines Johnson, former CIA Director Allen Dulles, Fidel Castro, and organized crime elements. The intersecting interests of these powerful figures have long fueled theories about a coordinated effort to remove Kennedy from office. The files show intelligence methods and CIA influence on U.S. foreign policy that many Americans were unaware of, suggesting deeper layers of government operation beyond public view. 

Why Conspiracy Theories Persist

The JFK assassination remains one of America’s most enduring sources of conspiracy theories for several compelling reasons. The brutal public murder of a President, followed by the killing of the accused assassin before he could stand trial, created immediate suspicion. The Warren Commission’s investigation, widely criticized for its rushed conclusion that Oswald acted alone, failed to answer key questions about the events in Dallas. The Zapruder film’s graphic documentation of the moment of assassination allowed Americans to witness the tragedy repeatedly, fueling endless analysis and speculation.

“The Trump administration’s newly released John F. Kennedy assassination files may not point directly to who shot the president, but they do expose the CIA and indicate a massive coverup,” says Frank De Varona.  

Historians still have significant questions about Oswald’s movements before the assassination, particularly his visit to Mexico City. Philip Shenon, author of books on the assassination, noted: “There’s reason to believe he talked openly about killing Kennedy in Mexico City and that people overheard him say that.” Many see the assassination as marking the end of American innocence, a pivotal moment when public trust in government institutions began to erode. Despite the new documents, most experts believe the debate over what really happened in Dallas is unlikely to end. 

A Step Toward Transparency

While the release of these documents is considered progress for government transparency, they don’t provide the definitive answers many Americans have sought for decades. Harvard historian Fredrik Logevall assessed the documents saying, “With respect to the assassination, there’s little or nothing that’s new, at least in terms of what I’ve been able to see thus far. I can’t say I’m surprised — going in I didn’t expect we’d learn anything that would overturn our understanding of what happened in Dallas.” The documents have, however, provided historical researchers with valuable information about Cold War operations. 

The files have revived old conspiracy theories while giving researchers new material to examine. Among these is the case of Gary Underhill, a military intelligence officer who allegedly claimed the CIA was involved in the assassination before his death by apparent suicide in 1964. Such connections between intelligence agencies and the assassination continue to draw public interest, even as official narratives remain unchanged. With additional files potentially still classified, the full story of November 22, 1963, may never be completely known.

RELATED ARTICLESMORE FROM AUTHOR