ALLEGATIONS CRUMBLES – He’s INNOCENT!

A police detective whose MS-13 accusation led to a legal immigrant’s deportation was himself convicted of misconduct involving sex workers, raising serious questions about the credibility of gang allegations used in immigration enforcement.

At a Glance

  • Detective Ivan Mendez accused Kilmar Abrego Garcia of MS-13 membership, leading to Garcia’s deportation
  • Mendez was later suspended and convicted for leaking confidential information to a woman he paid for sex
  • The only evidence against Garcia was Mendez’s field interview report, which was never cross-examined
  • Despite having legal status and a protective order against deportation, Garcia was sent to El Salvador
  • The Trump administration acknowledged an “administrative error” but has not facilitated Garcia’s return

Corrupted Evidence and False Gang Allegations

Detective Ivan Mendez of a local police department filed a field interview report claiming Kilmar Abrego Garcia was a member of the notorious MS-13 gang. This single report became the foundation for labeling Garcia as a dangerous gang member and triggering his deportation proceedings. 

However, substantial evidence now shows Mendez’s credibility was severely compromised at the time he made these allegations. The detective was suspended shortly after interviewing Garcia, and no other police records mentioned Garcia having any gang connections. 

The evidence against Garcia was considered “double hearsay” in legal terms. Mendez claimed a confidential informant identified Garcia as an MS-13 member, but Garcia had no ties to the alleged gang location and was actually arrested for loitering, not for any gang-related activity. Garcia’s attorney was never permitted to question Mendez or obtain any supporting evidence for the gang allegation. Despite these glaring issues, immigration authorities accepted the detective’s claim without verification. 

Officer’s Criminal Misconduct Exposed

The credibility of Mendez’s allegations crumbled further when his own criminal conduct came to light. The detective was indicted and pleaded guilty to serious misconduct charges for “providing information to a commercial sex worker who he was paying in exchange for sexual acts,” according to the police department. 

Mendez was given probation for his crimes, but the damage to Garcia’s life had already been done. The fact that Mendez was suspended for leaking confidential information raises serious questions about his handling of all cases, including Garcia’s. 

Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) claimed Garcia was detained “in connection with a murder investigation” and that his gang membership was “verified.” However, no evidence of either claim has ever been presented in court. In fact, the federal government has since dropped its claim that Garcia poses any danger to the community, effectively abandoning the gang affiliation accusation that was the basis for his removal. 

Legal Immigrant Wrongfully Deported

Garcia, a Salvadoran migrant, had been living legally in the United States with a work permit. He fled El Salvador in 2011 due to gang threats and had been granted a “withholding of removal” order, legally protecting him from deportation based on the likelihood of persecution if returned. Despite having this protective order, Garcia was arrested by ICE officers who claimed his immigration status had changed, though no documentation supported this claim.

In March 2023, despite legal protections that should have prevented his removal, Garcia was deported to El Salvador. The Trump administration has since admitted Garcia was deported due to an “administrative error” but has not taken steps to facilitate his return to the United States. A federal appeals court has found that the government abandoned its claim that Garcia was a community danger, effectively acknowledging the lack of credible evidence for the gang allegations that led to his deportation.

System Failure and Lack of Accountability

This case highlights disturbing failures in both law enforcement and immigration enforcement systems. A single unverified claim from a police officer later convicted of serious misconduct was sufficient to label a legal resident as a dangerous gang member and tear him from his life in America. Garcia was never charged with any crimes, yet was handed over to ICE based solely on an allegation that was never tested in court or supported by additional evidence.

The breakdown of due process is particularly concerning given that immigration proceedings often provide fewer protections than criminal courts. Garcia’s case demonstrates how easily unsubstantiated claims can lead to life-altering consequences when proper verification protocols and cross-examination are absent. Despite acknowledgment of errors, the lack of remedial action to return Garcia to his legal status in the United States represents an ongoing failure of accountability in the immigration enforcement system.